Tag: agile project management
10- PMP Questions 21-25
9- PMP Questions Set
8- PMP Questions Set
PMP Question 9
What primary advantage does consistent training and skill enhancement offer in project management?
A) Maintains team flexibility to accommodate evolving project demands and technological progress, thereby sustaining project efficiency and ensuring that the team remains agile in responding to changes.
B) Guarantees adherence to the most current industry standards and regulatory mandates, ensuring that the project stays compliant with evolving requirements and best practices.
C) Mainly aims to decrease the project’s dependence on external training provisions by building an internal knowledge base and expertise within the team, reducing the need for costly external training resources.
D) Enhances project implementation by establishing uniform skills and methodologies throughout the team, which leads to improved communication, collaboration, and overall project execution.
Erişim elde etmek için abone olun
Buna benzer içerikleri daha fazla okumak için bugün abone olun.
PMP Question 8
In the context of effective resource management planning, why is it crucial to maintain a pool of external resources such as freelancers or consultants?
A) It fosters a continuous influx of innovative ideas and diverse perspectives, enhancing the project’s creativity and adaptability.
B) External resources often possess specialized skills and expertise, making them more adept at handling intricate project tasks with efficiency.
C) Utilizing external resources tends to be a more financially prudent approach than investing in training existing staff for transient or specialized roles.
D) They serve as a reliable contingency plan, providing supplementary support during periods of heightened workloads or unforeseen resource scarcities, thereby ensuring uninterrupted project progression.
Erişim elde etmek için abone olun
Buna benzer içerikleri daha fazla okumak için bugün abone olun.
7- PMP Questions on Resource Management
6- PMP Questions About Resource Management
Enhancing Project Management through Interpersonal Skills
Effective Resource Management Planning
Understanding and Managing Your Product Backlog
Section 1: Overview of the Product Backlog
The Product Backlog is an essential tool for Agile software development teams. It is an ordered list of items that represent the features, enhancements, and fixes that the team plans to work on. The Product Backlog consists of Product Backlog Items (PBIs), which are organized based on their priority and level of detail.
PBIs are classified into four types: Themes, Epics, User Stories, and Tasks. Themes are long-term goals or high-level business objectives. Epics are substantial PBIs that need to be broken down into smaller user stories. User Stories are single, meaningful PBIs that can be completed within a sprint. Tasks are the specific tasks required to achieve a user story.
Section 2: Building Your Product Vision and Product Goal
The Product Vision describes the desired future state or result of a product. It sets a clear objective for the development team and stakeholders, guiding their actions and choices throughout the product development journey. The Product Goal represents a target for the Scrum Team to align their planning efforts. It encapsulates the long-term objective that the Scrum Team aims to achieve, emphasizing the need to complete or abandon one objective before pursuing the next.
Section 3: Creating Product Backlog Items (PBIs)
To create good PBIs, you can follow the INVEST acronym, which outlines key characteristics of well-formed and effective user stories. PBIs should be independent, negotiable, valuable, estimable, small, and testable. Each PBI should be self-contained and able to be worked on and delivered separately from other PBIs. PBIs should be open to discussion and collaboration between the development team and stakeholders. Each PBI should deliver value to the customer or end-user. PBIs should be able to be estimated in terms of effort or complexity. PBIs should be small enough to be completed within a single sprint or iteration. Each PBI should have clear acceptance criteria that can be used to verify its successful completion.
Section 4: Checking the Quality of PBIs
The 3C Model provides a framework for creating and refining PBIs. It emphasizes three key aspects: Card, Conversation, and Confirmation. The PBI is represented by a physical or virtual card that captures the essential information about the item. The card serves as a catalyst for a conversation between the development team and the stakeholders, discussing implementation details and clarifying any questions or concerns. The confirmation step involves defining specific acceptance criteria or tests that must be met for the PBI to be considered complete.
Section 5: Balancing the Product Backlog Prioritization
The product backlog prioritization quadrants offer a useful tool for managing and prioritizing the items in a product backlog. The quadrants help the Product Owner and the team strike a balance between different types of backlog items and make informed decisions about their sequencing. The quadrants divide the backlog into four quadrants: new features, architectural innovation, support, and technical debt.
Section 6: Managing the Quality of Product Backlog
The DEEP acronym provides guidance for managing the Product Backlog in Agile software development. The items at the top of the Product Backlog should be detailed enough to provide a clear understanding of what needs to be done. The Product Backlog is not fixed or set in stone and should evolve and emerge as new information and insights become available. Each item in the Product Backlog should have a relative estimation of its effort or complexity. The Product Backlog should be prioritized based on the value and importance of the items.
Section 7: Product Backlog Refinement
Product Backlog Refinement is the process of breaking down and further defining Product Backlog items into smaller, more precise items. It is an ongoing activity to add details, such as a description, order, and size. Refinement sessions should occur at least once per Sprint to ensure the Product Backlog remains current and actionable. The Product Owner, Scrum Master, and Developers can initiate refinement sessions whenever necessary to maintain the Product Backlog’s quality and ensure a shared understanding of the upcoming work.
Pair Comparison
Pair comparison is a powerful technique used in Agile methodology to compare two items or options and determine their relative importance or value. It is a useful tool for decision making and prioritizing tasks in Agile projects, enabling teams to make informed decisions and deliver high-quality deliverables. Pair comparison can be used in various situations such as deciding which feature to implement first, which user story is more important, or which task should be prioritized in a sprint.
In pair comparison, two items are compared against each other and rated based on their differences. The items can be user stories, features, tasks, or any other deliverables in an Agile project. The team members involved in the comparison assign scores or points to each item based on their perceived importance. Scores can be assigned on a numerical scale, such as 1 to 10, or a relative scale such as high, medium, or low.
The scores are then tallied, and the item with the highest score is given a higher priority. Through this process, teams can identify the most important items and prioritize them accordingly, ensuring that the most valuable work is completed first.
Pair comparison helps to avoid subjective decisions that can be influenced by biases or personal opinions. Instead, it allows teams to base their decisions on objective criteria, such as the value of the work to the project, its impact on stakeholders, or its alignment with project goals. This ensures that the prioritization process is fair and transparent, and everyone involved has a clear understanding of how decisions are made.
Pair comparison also helps to reduce the risk of decision paralysis, where teams struggle to make decisions due to a lack of clarity or consensus. By breaking down decisions into smaller, more manageable pairs, teams can more easily compare and contrast options, leading to faster and more effective decision making.
For example, let’s say a team has five user stories that they need to prioritize. The first step would be to compare the first user story against the second user story and assign a score based on which one is more important. Then, the team would compare the first user story against the third user story, and so on, until all pairs have been compared.
After comparing all pairs, the team can tally the scores and identify the user story with the highest score, which would be given the highest priority. They can then repeat this process to identify the next most important user story and so on until all user stories are prioritized.
Pair comparison is a powerful technique for prioritizing requirements because it helps to avoid subjective decisions that can be influenced by biases or personal opinions. Instead, it allows teams to base their decisions on objective criteria, such as the value of the requirement to the project, its impact on stakeholders, or its alignment with project goals. This ensures that the prioritization process is fair and transparent, and everyone involved has a clear understanding of how decisions are made.
Overall, pair comparison is a simple yet effective technique that helps Agile teams to prioritize work and make informed decisions. By using this technique, teams can ensure that they are delivering the most valuable work, improving project outcomes, and meeting stakeholder expectations.
Task Dependencies in Agile
Agile methodology may not be suitable for projects with many task dependencies. Agile teams work in an iterative manner and focus on delivering value quickly and continuously. However, if there are many dependencies that must be resolved before work can proceed, this can slow down the team’s ability to deliver value quickly. In such cases, other project management methodologies may be more appropriate.
For example, waiting for a lead time of a product can have negative impacts on the agile team’s ability to deliver value in a timely manner.
If an agile team waits for a lead time of a product, it can lead to several consequences. Firstly, it can cause delays in the delivery of the product, as the team is dependent on the lead time of the product before they can proceed with their work. This can lead to missed deadlines and unhappy customers.
Secondly, waiting for a lead time of a product can disrupt the flow of the team’s work. Agile teams work in short iterations, with a focus on delivering value quickly and continuously. Waiting for a lead time of a product goes against this principle and can cause the team to lose momentum and motivation.
Lastly, waiting for a lead time of a product can lead to a lack of transparency and communication between the team and stakeholders. The team may not be aware of the status of the product, which can lead to misunderstandings and miscommunication.
The Importance of Planning in an Agile Environment
In today’s fast-paced business world, it can be tempting to skip the planning process altogether, especially in an Agile environment where change is constant and the future is unpredictable. However, planning is still an essential part of any successful project. It provides a baseline for future discussions, allows for stakeholder input, and helps balance the portfolio of projects.
When creating a roadmap, the team should understand that change is not only possible, but necessary. Any new change should make the plan better, whether that means adding higher priority items, dropping lower ones out, making the plan more achievable or less risky, or better aligning schedules and dependencies. The original plan sets a baseline for future evaluations and discussions. Without a starting point, it’s impossible to know if a suggested change is a good one or not. Having a baseline plan makes it easier to make value comparisons and have healthy discussions.
Another use of a baseline plan is as a communication vehicle to talk about the roadmap with stakeholders. It allows stakeholders to ask their questions at the beginning and see if they can exert influence while there is still time to do so. Being able to start a conversation by recognizing the plan is only a draft invites input and changes at a time when changes are less expensive than later in the process. Using the baseline as a mechanism to have these discussions will be a lot easier than going to each stakeholder group with a blank canvas and attempting to fill it in with each one.
Part of the job of a program or portfolio manager is to create a balanced plan; a portfolio of projects that supports the organizational strategy. To see if a plan has balance, looking at the whole plan is required. Even if each project is solid on its own, it may not be true for the entire collection of projects. Creating a baseline portfolio allows for changes based on the entire plan, not just a single project.
For instance, assume that a portfolio contains ten projects. While all ten of them may anticipate good ROI, or all seem to have solid business cases behind them, it could very well be that isn’t true for the entire collection of projects. For example, while each of the projects are good, few of them have the chance to be spectacular, and none of them have the chance of truly outsized results. This may cause a program manager to make a change to the portfolio, adding in a more speculative and riskier project, and taking out one that has a higher chance of succeeding, but a lower ceiling if it does. On a one-for-one basis, this tradeoff might not make sense, but using a portfolio view, it can be wise. Remember that the goal doesn’t hinge on the outcome of one project, but instead on the collection of all of them.
Planning is still an essential part of any successful project or program, even in an Agile environment. It provides a baseline for future discussions, allows for stakeholder input, and helps balance the portfolio of projects. Skipping the planning process can lead to directionless execution or an inability to correct course mid-stream. Having a plan in place, even a flexible one, is essential for success in today’s business world.
Cost of An Agile Project
Calculating the cost of a sprint can be a complex task. However, by considering the following factors, we can get a better understanding of how much it will cost to complete a project:
- Team size: The number of people working on the sprint will affect the cost. More team members mean higher cost. This is because each team member will require expenditure, and more people working on a project means more expenditure.
- Team member rates: Each team member has a different hourly rate, depending on their role and experience level. For instance, a senior developer with years of experience will likely have a higher hourly rate than a junior developer. Therefore, it is important to account for these differences when calculating the cost of a sprint.
- Duration of the sprint: The longer the sprint, the higher the cost. This is because more hours will be required to complete the project. Additionally, there may be additional costs associated with a longer sprint, such as increased overhead costs.
- Overhead costs: These include expenses such as equipment, software licenses, office space, and utilities. These costs can add up quickly, especially for larger projects. Therefore, it is important to account for these costs when calculating the overall cost of a sprint.
Once we have all of the above information, we can calculate the cost of the sprint by multiplying the total number of hours worked by the team by the hourly rate of each team member. We then add any overhead costs to get the total cost of the sprint.
It is important to keep track of these costs and adjust them, if necessary, to ensure that the project stays within budget. By regularly monitoring the cost of a sprint, we can make informed decisions about how to allocate resources and keep the project on track.
In Scrum, the story point values are typically used to estimate the relative effort required to complete a task, rather than the actual cost in dollars or other currency. However, if the team has a good understanding of the relationship between story points and cost, they may be able to use story points as a proxy for cost when planning and budgeting for a project. This can be especially useful when working on an agile project where requirements are likely to change frequently, as it allows the team to adjust their budget and resources more easily as the project progresses.
How Can We Calculate Project Cost?
In an Agile project, it can be difficult to calculate the cost of a story point directly. However, by tracking the team’s velocity (i.e., the number of story points completed per sprint), we can estimate the team’s average rate of progress.
To calculate the cost of a story point, we need to know the average cost of a sprint. We can estimate this cost by dividing the total cost of a sprint by the number of story points completed in that sprint.
For example, if a sprint costs $10,000 and the team completes 50 story points, the cost per story point is $200 ($10,000 / 50).
Once we have an estimate of the cost per story point, we can use this information to plan and budget for future sprints. By estimating the number of story points required for each feature or user story, we can calculate the approximate cost of implementing that feature or story.
It’s important to note that this method is an estimate, and the actual cost of a story point may vary depending on a variety of factors such as team size, team member rates, and overhead costs. However, by tracking velocity and using historical data to estimate costs, we can make more informed decisions about how to allocate resources and plan for future sprints.
Gökrem Tekir Blog Sayfası 